Tuesday, May 25, 2004
New York here we come!
This is my last entry until next Monday night, May 31.
At 10 AM tomorrow (Wednesday), Pat Kolon and I will head south on I 75 in Sojourner, my handicap-accessible minivan, pass through Toledo, Ohio, and get on the Ohio Turnpike going east. From there until we drive under the Hudson River via the Lincoln Tunnel and arrive at our hotel in Times Square, we'll keep following turnpikes through Ohio, Pennsylvania and New Jersey. We'll probably spent tomorrow night in the Pocono Mountains, and hope to make it into the city in the early afternoon on Thursday.
After checking in at the Westin New York at Times Square--a new 45-story hotel where my niece Gretchen O'Connell got group rates for her out-of-town wedding guests--Pat and I will probably head off towards Greenwich Village where we have reservations to see the blues great, Taj Mahal at the Blue Note, for the 8 PM show. In phone calls to the Blue Note about accessibility concerns, I've found them to be helpful and friendly. They've even promised to carry me and my scooter up the one small step into the club if necessary! They've also offered to reserve us a table, which is something they only do for VIPs. Does that make me a VIP? My niece, Carolyn Dorsey, who lives in New Jersey, is going to meet Pat and me in front of the club at 6:30 PM, and we'll go in, get our table, and have dinner before the show starts at 8 PM. Carolyn, who has been to the Blue Note before, says it is tiny and they "pack them in like sardines." Well, we sardines want to stake our spot before the can gets too full!
Friday is our "see New York" day and we'll just follow our inclinations. On Friday night we have tickets to see the legendary jazz pianist, Marian McPartland at Birdland, at 9 PM. Again, folks at Birdland are going to hold a table for me. I'm feeling at home in the city already. Saturday is my niece's wedding day, and I plan to be with family all that day and night. Gretchen and Matt, who live in Manhattan, decided to get married in Central Park--please hold thoughts of nice dry skies--at 4 PM, with a reception at 6:00 PM at an Italian restaurant near Times Square. I expect we'll all go someplace after that. My friend Pat will spend the day with her dear friend Bernadette who is coming up from Washington, DC for the weekend.
Sunday we'll check out of the hotel, pick up Sojourner the minivan--that will have been on a barge in the middle of the Hudson River because that's where vehicles go that are put in NYC parking garages overnight--drive to Greenwich Village, hopefully find parking, and go back to the Blue Note for brunch and a performance by the famous jazz bassist, Kiyoshi Kitagawa. We'll leave directly from there for our trip home. After spending Sunday night on the road, we plan to arrive in Detroit on Monday afternoon, May 31.
Seeing it all laid out like that makes me VERY EXCITED!!! But it also makes me realize I'd better get to bed early tonight. I'm in for some wonderfully long days and nights. Have a great weekend yourself, and I'll talk to you next week. And of course, I'm taking my digital camera so later in the week you'll also have a NYC photo album. And now to bed.
At 10 AM tomorrow (Wednesday), Pat Kolon and I will head south on I 75 in Sojourner, my handicap-accessible minivan, pass through Toledo, Ohio, and get on the Ohio Turnpike going east. From there until we drive under the Hudson River via the Lincoln Tunnel and arrive at our hotel in Times Square, we'll keep following turnpikes through Ohio, Pennsylvania and New Jersey. We'll probably spent tomorrow night in the Pocono Mountains, and hope to make it into the city in the early afternoon on Thursday.
After checking in at the Westin New York at Times Square--a new 45-story hotel where my niece Gretchen O'Connell got group rates for her out-of-town wedding guests--Pat and I will probably head off towards Greenwich Village where we have reservations to see the blues great, Taj Mahal at the Blue Note, for the 8 PM show. In phone calls to the Blue Note about accessibility concerns, I've found them to be helpful and friendly. They've even promised to carry me and my scooter up the one small step into the club if necessary! They've also offered to reserve us a table, which is something they only do for VIPs. Does that make me a VIP? My niece, Carolyn Dorsey, who lives in New Jersey, is going to meet Pat and me in front of the club at 6:30 PM, and we'll go in, get our table, and have dinner before the show starts at 8 PM. Carolyn, who has been to the Blue Note before, says it is tiny and they "pack them in like sardines." Well, we sardines want to stake our spot before the can gets too full!
Friday is our "see New York" day and we'll just follow our inclinations. On Friday night we have tickets to see the legendary jazz pianist, Marian McPartland at Birdland, at 9 PM. Again, folks at Birdland are going to hold a table for me. I'm feeling at home in the city already. Saturday is my niece's wedding day, and I plan to be with family all that day and night. Gretchen and Matt, who live in Manhattan, decided to get married in Central Park--please hold thoughts of nice dry skies--at 4 PM, with a reception at 6:00 PM at an Italian restaurant near Times Square. I expect we'll all go someplace after that. My friend Pat will spend the day with her dear friend Bernadette who is coming up from Washington, DC for the weekend.
Sunday we'll check out of the hotel, pick up Sojourner the minivan--that will have been on a barge in the middle of the Hudson River because that's where vehicles go that are put in NYC parking garages overnight--drive to Greenwich Village, hopefully find parking, and go back to the Blue Note for brunch and a performance by the famous jazz bassist, Kiyoshi Kitagawa. We'll leave directly from there for our trip home. After spending Sunday night on the road, we plan to arrive in Detroit on Monday afternoon, May 31.
Seeing it all laid out like that makes me VERY EXCITED!!! But it also makes me realize I'd better get to bed early tonight. I'm in for some wonderfully long days and nights. Have a great weekend yourself, and I'll talk to you next week. And of course, I'm taking my digital camera so later in the week you'll also have a NYC photo album. And now to bed.
Monday, May 24, 2004
Somebody grab the wheel!
How I would love to write about purple irises and red poppies dotting lawns so green you'd think they'd been painted by exuberant children. Or nights illuminated by flashes of lightning, sometimes right overhead and other times far in the distance. Or one of the many spring showers that left behind a large puddle on a soccer field near my house where I saw a falcon splashing on Saturday afternoon. Or the surprise of seeing two horseback riders out for a Sunday morning ride on my favorite scooting street yesterday.
Life is so good, why do we humans insist on messing it up?
I cannot stop thinking about the wedding out in the desert near the Syrian border of Iraq. Not only is it an absolute horror that the US military planes strafed those houses so mercilessly that 45 innocent people were killed, at least 13 of them children and 11 women, but the US military continues to justify the massacre by insisting it was a "safehouse for foreign fighters."
The AP reports today that
TV Image shows the bride arriving for her wedding party in the remote desert area near Mogr el-Deeb, Iraq, Tuesday, May 18, 2004.
Iraqi children celebrate during a wedding ceremony shortly before U.S. helicopters fired on the party, according to survivors of the attack, in the remote desert area near Mogr el-Deeb, Iraq , 600 km west of Baghdad and 20 km from the Syrian border, in this image made Sunday, May 23, 2004 from a Wednesday May 19 video obtained by the Associated Press. The attack killed more than 40 people, including Yasser Shawkat Abdullah, the cameraman who filmed the video. The U.S. military says it is investigating the attack and that evidence so far indicates the target was a safehouse for foreign fighters. (AP Photo/APTN)
The videotape obtained Sunday by Associated Press Television News captures a wedding party that survivors say was later attacked by U.S. planes early Wednesday, killing up to 45 people. The dead included the cameraman, Yasser Shawkat Abdullah, hired to record the festivities, which ended Tuesday night before the planes struck.
The U.S. military says it is investigating the attack, which took place in the village of Mogr el-Deeb about five miles from the Syrian border, but that all evidence so far indicates the target was a safehouse for foreign fighters.
"There was no evidence of a wedding: no decorations, no musical instruments found, no large quantities of food or leftover servings one would expect from a wedding celebration," Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt said Saturday. "There may have been some kind of celebration. Bad people have celebrations, too."
But video that APTN shot a day after the attack shows fragments of musical instruments, pots and pans and brightly colored beddings used for celebrations, scattered around the bombed out tent.
An AP reporter and photographer, who interviewed more than a dozen survivors a day after the bombing, were able to identify many of them on the wedding party video - which runs for several hours.
APTN also traveled to Mogr el-Deeb, 250 miles west of Ramadi, the day after the attack to film what the survivors said was the wedding site. A devastated building and remnants of the tent, pots and pans could be seen, along with bits of what appeared to be the remnants of ordnance, one of which bore the marking "ATU-35," similar to those on U.S. bombs.
A water tanker truck can be seen in both the video shot by APTN and the wedding tape obtained from a cousin of the groom.
On Monday, a senior coalition military officer said "we still don't believe there was a wedding going on" and that intelligence showed that only legitimate targets were attacked. The survivors agree that the wedding festivities had broken up for the night when the attack began, but they insist that there were no foreign fighters or other combatants in their group.
When is the US top brass going to come clean and admit that they murdered 45 innocent people? Of course they don't want to do this, especially when they're in the middle of dealing with the Abu Ghraib prison torture scandal, but they must. And don't think they didn't know what actually happened. From the AP report, we read that
Haleema Shihab, 32, one of the three wives of Rikad Nayef, said that as the first bombs fell, she grabbed her seven-month old son, Yousef, and clutching the hands of her five-year-old son, Hamza, started running. Her 15-year-old son, Ali, sprinted alongside her. They managed to run for several yards when she fell - her leg fractured.
"Hamza was yelling, 'mommy,'" Shihab, recalled. "Ali said he was hurt and that he was bleeding. That's the last time I heard him." Then another shell fell and injured Shihab's left arm.
"Hamza fell from my hand and was gone. Only Yousef stayed in my arms. Ali had been hit and was killed. I couldn't go back," she said from her hospital bed in Ramadi. Her arm was in a cast.
She and her stepdaughter, Iqbal - who had caught up with her - hid in a bomb crater. "We were bleeding from 3 a.m. until sunrise," Shihab said.
Soon American soldiers came. One of them kicked her to see if she was alive, she said.
"I pretended I was dead so he wouldn't kill me," said Shihab. She said the soldier was laughing.
Those soldiers saw the bodies strewn on the desert that morning. They couldn't have missed the fact that many of them were women and children. They knew what they had done. And now they're lying. Pure and simple. But the videotape doesn't lie. And neither do the survivors.
And let's talk for just a minute about the importance of having even a little knowledge about the customs of the country you've attacked and occupied. Listen to the ignorance displayed by our military leaders in this article from the Independent/UK:
"How many people go to the middle of the desert 10 miles from the Syrian border to hold a wedding?" demanded Maj-Gen Mattis.
The answer is plenty, if you come from a clan of livestock herders and that is where you have lived all your life. The clan straddles the Syrian border; even distant relatives would be expected to turn up from there, as well as the far corners of Iraq.
Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt, the US military spokesman in Iraq, said US forces found guns, Syrian passports and a satellite phone at the scene of the fighting. None of that was surprising, either: even in the cities, every house has a weapon. In a village 75 miles from the nearest town they are even more necessary, both to protect against bandits and to shield flocks from wild animals. With no telephone lines and no mobile coverage, it is not unusual for such places to have a satellite phone as well.
Some of my blog and journal readers say to me, "Patricia, you can't let yourself get so upset about these things. You'll get depressed."
Well, I'm not depressed, my friends, I am OUTRAGED! How could the country of my birth have come to this? Even Andy Rooney, who can usually find the silver lining to any dark cloud, says "Our Darkest Days Are Here."
Oh, by the way, do you want to know the kind of weekend our commander-in-chief had? Columnist Bob Herbert writes that
President Bush fell off his bike and hurt himself during a 17-mile excursion at his ranch in Crawford, Tex., on Saturday. Nothing serious. A few cuts and bruises. He was wearing a bike helmet and a mouth guard, and he was able to climb back on his bike and finish his ride.
A little later he left the ranch and went to Austin for a graduation party for his daughter Jenna. And then it was on to New Haven, where daughter Barbara will graduate today from Yale. Except for the bicycle mishap, it sounded like a very pleasant weekend.
Herbert ends his column by saying
There's a terrible sense of dread filtering across America at the moment and it's not simply because of the continuing fear of terrorism and the fact that the nation is at war. It's more frightening than that. It grows out of the suspicion that we all may be passengers in a vehicle that has made a radically wrong turn and is barreling along a dark road, with its headlights off and with someone behind the wheel who may not know how to drive.
Life is so good, why do we humans insist on messing it up?
I cannot stop thinking about the wedding out in the desert near the Syrian border of Iraq. Not only is it an absolute horror that the US military planes strafed those houses so mercilessly that 45 innocent people were killed, at least 13 of them children and 11 women, but the US military continues to justify the massacre by insisting it was a "safehouse for foreign fighters."
The AP reports today that
TV Image shows the bride arriving for her wedding party in the remote desert area near Mogr el-Deeb, Iraq, Tuesday, May 18, 2004.
Iraqi children celebrate during a wedding ceremony shortly before U.S. helicopters fired on the party, according to survivors of the attack, in the remote desert area near Mogr el-Deeb, Iraq , 600 km west of Baghdad and 20 km from the Syrian border, in this image made Sunday, May 23, 2004 from a Wednesday May 19 video obtained by the Associated Press. The attack killed more than 40 people, including Yasser Shawkat Abdullah, the cameraman who filmed the video. The U.S. military says it is investigating the attack and that evidence so far indicates the target was a safehouse for foreign fighters. (AP Photo/APTN)
The videotape obtained Sunday by Associated Press Television News captures a wedding party that survivors say was later attacked by U.S. planes early Wednesday, killing up to 45 people. The dead included the cameraman, Yasser Shawkat Abdullah, hired to record the festivities, which ended Tuesday night before the planes struck.
The U.S. military says it is investigating the attack, which took place in the village of Mogr el-Deeb about five miles from the Syrian border, but that all evidence so far indicates the target was a safehouse for foreign fighters.
"There was no evidence of a wedding: no decorations, no musical instruments found, no large quantities of food or leftover servings one would expect from a wedding celebration," Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt said Saturday. "There may have been some kind of celebration. Bad people have celebrations, too."
But video that APTN shot a day after the attack shows fragments of musical instruments, pots and pans and brightly colored beddings used for celebrations, scattered around the bombed out tent.
An AP reporter and photographer, who interviewed more than a dozen survivors a day after the bombing, were able to identify many of them on the wedding party video - which runs for several hours.
APTN also traveled to Mogr el-Deeb, 250 miles west of Ramadi, the day after the attack to film what the survivors said was the wedding site. A devastated building and remnants of the tent, pots and pans could be seen, along with bits of what appeared to be the remnants of ordnance, one of which bore the marking "ATU-35," similar to those on U.S. bombs.
A water tanker truck can be seen in both the video shot by APTN and the wedding tape obtained from a cousin of the groom.
On Monday, a senior coalition military officer said "we still don't believe there was a wedding going on" and that intelligence showed that only legitimate targets were attacked. The survivors agree that the wedding festivities had broken up for the night when the attack began, but they insist that there were no foreign fighters or other combatants in their group.
When is the US top brass going to come clean and admit that they murdered 45 innocent people? Of course they don't want to do this, especially when they're in the middle of dealing with the Abu Ghraib prison torture scandal, but they must. And don't think they didn't know what actually happened. From the AP report, we read that
Haleema Shihab, 32, one of the three wives of Rikad Nayef, said that as the first bombs fell, she grabbed her seven-month old son, Yousef, and clutching the hands of her five-year-old son, Hamza, started running. Her 15-year-old son, Ali, sprinted alongside her. They managed to run for several yards when she fell - her leg fractured.
"Hamza was yelling, 'mommy,'" Shihab, recalled. "Ali said he was hurt and that he was bleeding. That's the last time I heard him." Then another shell fell and injured Shihab's left arm.
"Hamza fell from my hand and was gone. Only Yousef stayed in my arms. Ali had been hit and was killed. I couldn't go back," she said from her hospital bed in Ramadi. Her arm was in a cast.
She and her stepdaughter, Iqbal - who had caught up with her - hid in a bomb crater. "We were bleeding from 3 a.m. until sunrise," Shihab said.
Soon American soldiers came. One of them kicked her to see if she was alive, she said.
"I pretended I was dead so he wouldn't kill me," said Shihab. She said the soldier was laughing.
Those soldiers saw the bodies strewn on the desert that morning. They couldn't have missed the fact that many of them were women and children. They knew what they had done. And now they're lying. Pure and simple. But the videotape doesn't lie. And neither do the survivors.
And let's talk for just a minute about the importance of having even a little knowledge about the customs of the country you've attacked and occupied. Listen to the ignorance displayed by our military leaders in this article from the Independent/UK:
"How many people go to the middle of the desert 10 miles from the Syrian border to hold a wedding?" demanded Maj-Gen Mattis.
The answer is plenty, if you come from a clan of livestock herders and that is where you have lived all your life. The clan straddles the Syrian border; even distant relatives would be expected to turn up from there, as well as the far corners of Iraq.
Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt, the US military spokesman in Iraq, said US forces found guns, Syrian passports and a satellite phone at the scene of the fighting. None of that was surprising, either: even in the cities, every house has a weapon. In a village 75 miles from the nearest town they are even more necessary, both to protect against bandits and to shield flocks from wild animals. With no telephone lines and no mobile coverage, it is not unusual for such places to have a satellite phone as well.
Some of my blog and journal readers say to me, "Patricia, you can't let yourself get so upset about these things. You'll get depressed."
Well, I'm not depressed, my friends, I am OUTRAGED! How could the country of my birth have come to this? Even Andy Rooney, who can usually find the silver lining to any dark cloud, says "Our Darkest Days Are Here."
Oh, by the way, do you want to know the kind of weekend our commander-in-chief had? Columnist Bob Herbert writes that
President Bush fell off his bike and hurt himself during a 17-mile excursion at his ranch in Crawford, Tex., on Saturday. Nothing serious. A few cuts and bruises. He was wearing a bike helmet and a mouth guard, and he was able to climb back on his bike and finish his ride.
A little later he left the ranch and went to Austin for a graduation party for his daughter Jenna. And then it was on to New Haven, where daughter Barbara will graduate today from Yale. Except for the bicycle mishap, it sounded like a very pleasant weekend.
Herbert ends his column by saying
There's a terrible sense of dread filtering across America at the moment and it's not simply because of the continuing fear of terrorism and the fact that the nation is at war. It's more frightening than that. It grows out of the suspicion that we all may be passengers in a vehicle that has made a radically wrong turn and is barreling along a dark road, with its headlights off and with someone behind the wheel who may not know how to drive.
Sunday, May 23, 2004
"Sharon's Shell Game in Rafah" by Starhawk
As horror upon horror spills out of the Bush-led occupation of Iraq, it's easy to miss the horrors being done to the Palestinian people (and animals) of Rafah by his pal, Ariel Sharon. They talk about "compassion fatigue", well we're looking at the danger of giving in to "horror fatigue." Just how much can we take without falling into a pit of despair or going numb?
I advise taking "news-free" days where we go outside, place our feet and hands in the earth, let our faces be kissed by sun or washed by rain, and recognize that there is wonder to be found even as humans around us are making unbelievably poor choices. And then come back and read analyses like this one from Starhawk that help us see what is happening in the world around us. As Americans, we should be especially cognizant of what Ariel Sharon is doing to the Palestinian people because we personally support his choices with our hard-earned tax dollars...$15 million per day.
Yes, this post is long, but I hope you will take the time to read it from beginning to end. Starhawk's perspective is one you will not find reflected in the mainstream media nor in the speeches or voting records of most US politicians. That makes it all the more important. She has made four trips to the Occupied Territories in the last two years, has studied the historical, social, political and religious backgound of the conflict there, and offers a well-thought out analysis of what Sharon's most recent escalation of military violence in Rafah means today and for the future.
May 23, 2004
Just over a year ago, I sat in a home near the Egyptian border in Rafah, in the Gaza strip. A five-year-old, curly-haired charmer of a girl was on my lap. Her older sister and brothers did homework to the background music of the thudding of bullets into the walls. The children were so inured to gunfire from the Israeli sniper towers and tanks that they didn't even react until the gunfire grew so loud that the older ones dived for the floor, the babies for the fragile shelter of their mother's arms.
I was there with the International Solidarity Movement, which supports nonviolent resistance against the Occupation. I'd come to help the teams that were with our member Rachel Corrie, who was crushed by a soldier in a bulldozer as she attempted to stop a home demolition, and with Tom Hurndall when he was shot trying to rescue a group of children who were under fire from an Israeli sniper tower.
I think of them, of the families I met and the traumatized children who followed us in packs whenever we ventured out on the streets, as I read the horrifying reports of the last weeks in Rafah. The homes I stayed in have been razed to the ground, along with the crowded neighborhoods where the old men would visit each other at twilight to brew tea over a small fire and talk, where the women still baked bread in clay ovens. The olive groves, the orange trees have fallen to bulldozers. Children like the ones I held and sang to, and their parents, have been killed in the demonstrations protesting the destruction of their communities.
To make the lives of those more hopeful, and to safeguard the lives of Israeli children, it is vital that we understand the true thrust of Sharon's current policies. Sharon is the sleight-of-hand magician, saying "Look here!" while the real action is somewhere else. Sharon says, "Look over here! We're pulling out of Gaza!" and Bush says, "OK, and in return, we'll stop looking at what you're doing in the West Bank." But Gaza and the West Bank are related, and unless we keep our eyes on both, we'll be victimized by the shell game.
Firing on a crowd of peaceful demonstrators with tank shells and helicopter gunships was such an outrage that it finally caught the attention of a jaded and cynical world. But the Israeli military has been responding to nonviolent demonstrations with extreme violence consistently throughout the past months, when an upsurge of civil resistance has arisen in the West Bank. This growing nonviolent movement is focused against the so-called 'security' wall that the military is building, which winds its way deep into Palestinian territory, confiscating farmland without compensation, scarring the green hills, uprooting ancient olive trees, and destroying the very communities who have historically had the most peaceful relationships with their Israeli neighbors.
Those demonstrations have been supported by internationals from the International Solidarity Movement, the International Women's Peace Service, and other human rights groups. The villagers have also called for help from the Israeli peace community, and groups as diverse as Rabbis for Human Rights, Bat Shalom, and Anarchists Against the Wall have responded, along with many others. Standing together, Palestinians, Israelis and internationals have faced clubs, horses, and arrests, and been fired on with sound bombs, tear gas, rubber coated steel bullets, and real bullets. In the village of Biddu alone, five Palestinians have been shot to death and one has died of tear gas inhalation in peaceful, unarmed protests. Israelis, too, have been seriously injured, and many have privately confessed to me that they believe it is only a matter of time before an Israeli is killed.
The first intifada, in the late eighties, was primarily a movement of civil resistance, involving every sector of society in acts of noncompliance with the occupation, such as boycotts, work stoppages and tax revolts. Among Palestinians, the first intifada is seen as bringing Israel to the bargaining table, establishing the PLO as the negotiating voice of the Palestinian movement, and laying the groundwork for the Oslo peace accords.
But the Oslo process is widely seen as one of betrayal. During the decade of Oslo, Israel continued to fund and support illegal settlements--really armed suburbs planted on hilltops--in the West Bank and Gaza, doubling the number of settlers. They confiscated Palestinian land without compensation, built a network of roads which are off-limits to Palestinians and which divide and segment their communities, and established a huge military infrastructure to guard the settlers and staff the checkpoints that restrict Palestinian freedom of movement. Disillusionment with Oslo led to disbelief in the Israeli government's good faith, and formed the ground for the armed struggle that characterizes the second intifada.
Only a tiny fraction of the Palestinian population actively participates in armed resistance. The vast majority of people want to defend their rights, but don't want to kill. A mass movement of civil resistance could provide an avenue for that struggle and kindle international sympathy and support. A movement in which Palestinians and Israelis struggle together, side by side, facing the same clubs and bullets as they have been in these past months, is tremendously threatening to the power base of the Israeli right wing. So this movement must be repressed, its leaders arrested, international peace activists denied entry, and demonstrations brutally repressed. The shooting of demonstrators in the West Bank sets the stage for the shelling of a demonstration in Gaza and the deaths of dozens of Palestinians.
The West Bank is the goal of Sharon's aborted Gaza pullout. Gaza has few resources, was not part of biblical Israel, and contains a large and unruly Palestinian population who cannot easily be integrated into Israel proper without threatening the demographics that maintain the thin fiction that Israel can be both Jewish and democratic, while denying full rights to the twenty percent of its own citizens who are Palestinian, and keeping those who live in the territories under martial law for decades.
In the contest for this region, the West Bank is the prize. It contains some of the most fertile land, two major aquifers, and regions of still-unspoiled natural beauty. Most importantly, it is the historic land of the Bible, where Abraham walked and is buried, where Joshua fought his battle of Jericho, where the prophets thundered and the festivals were celebrated. The West Bank was Judea and Samaria, the heart of the promised land.
Trading Gaza for Bush's tacit agreement to the annexation of the West Bank looked like a good deal to Sharon. However, he couldn't sell the deal to the right wing of his own party, who don't want to give up an inch or retreat from so much as an outhouse. So now the military has repaid assaults on soldiers by massive home demolitions and all-out war on civilians.
The 'security' wall is not a response to suicide bombings or some escalated condition of danger. It is part of a long-planned strategy, in place since the 1970s, to expand the state of Israel into the coveted West Bank lands. One piece of that strategy has been the building of the illegal settlements which the wall encloses and, in effect, annexes along with surrounding farmland, destroying the livelihood of the neighboring Palestinian farmers. The linked maze of barriers isolates many Palestinian villages, enclosing them behind barbed wire, cutting them off from each other and the rest of the West Bank, and turning them into open-air prisons. The wall and settlements are also linked to the building of Israel's transnational highway, which will shift population within Israel proper to the east, closer to the settlement blocs, so that they can become fully integrated parts of Israel proper.
The wall confiscates land that sits atop the major aquifers of the region. Already the settlers, who comprise less than 10% of the population of the West Bank, use 80% of the water resources. The wall will take what's left.
The wall is the end of any possible Palestinian state. The two-state solution was a reluctant compromise for many Palestinians, but was adopted and supported by their leadership and the vast majority of those who live in the Occupied Territories. It relinquished almost 80% of the historic land of Palestine to Israel, in return for the promise of an autonomous state on the other 20%.To most Israelis, it seemed a reasonable solution, and most Palestinians were willing to accept it, however reluctantly.
With the construction of the wall, that option is gone. The wall does not leave enough territory, water or resources to constitute a state. It creates isolated, open-air prisons out of the Palestinian population centers.
Whether you personally favor a two-state, one-state or no-state solution, unilaterally removing one of the major options for the region is no way to bring about either peace or security. And if Sharon's policies remove the option of a separate state for Palestinians, we must ask what end-game is he planning? Perpetual occupation, eternal effectual imprisonment for four million people? Transfer? Outright genocide? These options, elsewhere, are called 'ethnic cleansing,' and none of them are likely to bring about increased security or peace for Israel or the rest of the world.
A real policy of security would begin with a moratorium, on Israel's part, on the building of the wall, on policies of 'targeted assassinations', on attacks on civilians and brutal responses to nonviolent demonstrations. Such acts would be a small beginning of a change in course that would demonstrate good faith and a genuine desire for negotiations in which all people of the region could have a voice in determining their future.
It is up to those of us in the US, which funds the Occupation, and the international community to raise our voices now, to put pressure on Sharon to stop murdering civilians and children in the name of security, and begin pursuing a true path toward peace.
*********************************************
For a map of the wall, see:
http://www.gush-shalom.org/thewall/index.html
For information about the International Solidarity Movement, see
http://www.palsolidarity.org .
Starhawk has made four trips to the Occupied Terriitories in the last two years with the International Solidarity Movement. For an archive of her posts and writings about Palestine, see http://www.starhawk.org. She is an activist, organizer, and author of nine published books, including her latest, "Webs of Power: Notes from the Global Uprising" and eight other books on feminism, politics and earth-based spirituality. She teaches Earth Activist Trainings that combine permaculture design and activist skills, and works with the RANT trainer's collective, http://www.rantcollective.org that offers training and support for mobilizations around global justice and peace issues.
To get Starhawk's periodic posts of her writings, email Starhawk-subscribe@lists.riseup.net and put 'subscribe' in the subject heading.
I advise taking "news-free" days where we go outside, place our feet and hands in the earth, let our faces be kissed by sun or washed by rain, and recognize that there is wonder to be found even as humans around us are making unbelievably poor choices. And then come back and read analyses like this one from Starhawk that help us see what is happening in the world around us. As Americans, we should be especially cognizant of what Ariel Sharon is doing to the Palestinian people because we personally support his choices with our hard-earned tax dollars...$15 million per day.
Yes, this post is long, but I hope you will take the time to read it from beginning to end. Starhawk's perspective is one you will not find reflected in the mainstream media nor in the speeches or voting records of most US politicians. That makes it all the more important. She has made four trips to the Occupied Territories in the last two years, has studied the historical, social, political and religious backgound of the conflict there, and offers a well-thought out analysis of what Sharon's most recent escalation of military violence in Rafah means today and for the future.
May 23, 2004
Just over a year ago, I sat in a home near the Egyptian border in Rafah, in the Gaza strip. A five-year-old, curly-haired charmer of a girl was on my lap. Her older sister and brothers did homework to the background music of the thudding of bullets into the walls. The children were so inured to gunfire from the Israeli sniper towers and tanks that they didn't even react until the gunfire grew so loud that the older ones dived for the floor, the babies for the fragile shelter of their mother's arms.
I was there with the International Solidarity Movement, which supports nonviolent resistance against the Occupation. I'd come to help the teams that were with our member Rachel Corrie, who was crushed by a soldier in a bulldozer as she attempted to stop a home demolition, and with Tom Hurndall when he was shot trying to rescue a group of children who were under fire from an Israeli sniper tower.
I think of them, of the families I met and the traumatized children who followed us in packs whenever we ventured out on the streets, as I read the horrifying reports of the last weeks in Rafah. The homes I stayed in have been razed to the ground, along with the crowded neighborhoods where the old men would visit each other at twilight to brew tea over a small fire and talk, where the women still baked bread in clay ovens. The olive groves, the orange trees have fallen to bulldozers. Children like the ones I held and sang to, and their parents, have been killed in the demonstrations protesting the destruction of their communities.
To make the lives of those more hopeful, and to safeguard the lives of Israeli children, it is vital that we understand the true thrust of Sharon's current policies. Sharon is the sleight-of-hand magician, saying "Look here!" while the real action is somewhere else. Sharon says, "Look over here! We're pulling out of Gaza!" and Bush says, "OK, and in return, we'll stop looking at what you're doing in the West Bank." But Gaza and the West Bank are related, and unless we keep our eyes on both, we'll be victimized by the shell game.
Firing on a crowd of peaceful demonstrators with tank shells and helicopter gunships was such an outrage that it finally caught the attention of a jaded and cynical world. But the Israeli military has been responding to nonviolent demonstrations with extreme violence consistently throughout the past months, when an upsurge of civil resistance has arisen in the West Bank. This growing nonviolent movement is focused against the so-called 'security' wall that the military is building, which winds its way deep into Palestinian territory, confiscating farmland without compensation, scarring the green hills, uprooting ancient olive trees, and destroying the very communities who have historically had the most peaceful relationships with their Israeli neighbors.
Those demonstrations have been supported by internationals from the International Solidarity Movement, the International Women's Peace Service, and other human rights groups. The villagers have also called for help from the Israeli peace community, and groups as diverse as Rabbis for Human Rights, Bat Shalom, and Anarchists Against the Wall have responded, along with many others. Standing together, Palestinians, Israelis and internationals have faced clubs, horses, and arrests, and been fired on with sound bombs, tear gas, rubber coated steel bullets, and real bullets. In the village of Biddu alone, five Palestinians have been shot to death and one has died of tear gas inhalation in peaceful, unarmed protests. Israelis, too, have been seriously injured, and many have privately confessed to me that they believe it is only a matter of time before an Israeli is killed.
The first intifada, in the late eighties, was primarily a movement of civil resistance, involving every sector of society in acts of noncompliance with the occupation, such as boycotts, work stoppages and tax revolts. Among Palestinians, the first intifada is seen as bringing Israel to the bargaining table, establishing the PLO as the negotiating voice of the Palestinian movement, and laying the groundwork for the Oslo peace accords.
But the Oslo process is widely seen as one of betrayal. During the decade of Oslo, Israel continued to fund and support illegal settlements--really armed suburbs planted on hilltops--in the West Bank and Gaza, doubling the number of settlers. They confiscated Palestinian land without compensation, built a network of roads which are off-limits to Palestinians and which divide and segment their communities, and established a huge military infrastructure to guard the settlers and staff the checkpoints that restrict Palestinian freedom of movement. Disillusionment with Oslo led to disbelief in the Israeli government's good faith, and formed the ground for the armed struggle that characterizes the second intifada.
Only a tiny fraction of the Palestinian population actively participates in armed resistance. The vast majority of people want to defend their rights, but don't want to kill. A mass movement of civil resistance could provide an avenue for that struggle and kindle international sympathy and support. A movement in which Palestinians and Israelis struggle together, side by side, facing the same clubs and bullets as they have been in these past months, is tremendously threatening to the power base of the Israeli right wing. So this movement must be repressed, its leaders arrested, international peace activists denied entry, and demonstrations brutally repressed. The shooting of demonstrators in the West Bank sets the stage for the shelling of a demonstration in Gaza and the deaths of dozens of Palestinians.
The West Bank is the goal of Sharon's aborted Gaza pullout. Gaza has few resources, was not part of biblical Israel, and contains a large and unruly Palestinian population who cannot easily be integrated into Israel proper without threatening the demographics that maintain the thin fiction that Israel can be both Jewish and democratic, while denying full rights to the twenty percent of its own citizens who are Palestinian, and keeping those who live in the territories under martial law for decades.
In the contest for this region, the West Bank is the prize. It contains some of the most fertile land, two major aquifers, and regions of still-unspoiled natural beauty. Most importantly, it is the historic land of the Bible, where Abraham walked and is buried, where Joshua fought his battle of Jericho, where the prophets thundered and the festivals were celebrated. The West Bank was Judea and Samaria, the heart of the promised land.
Trading Gaza for Bush's tacit agreement to the annexation of the West Bank looked like a good deal to Sharon. However, he couldn't sell the deal to the right wing of his own party, who don't want to give up an inch or retreat from so much as an outhouse. So now the military has repaid assaults on soldiers by massive home demolitions and all-out war on civilians.
The 'security' wall is not a response to suicide bombings or some escalated condition of danger. It is part of a long-planned strategy, in place since the 1970s, to expand the state of Israel into the coveted West Bank lands. One piece of that strategy has been the building of the illegal settlements which the wall encloses and, in effect, annexes along with surrounding farmland, destroying the livelihood of the neighboring Palestinian farmers. The linked maze of barriers isolates many Palestinian villages, enclosing them behind barbed wire, cutting them off from each other and the rest of the West Bank, and turning them into open-air prisons. The wall and settlements are also linked to the building of Israel's transnational highway, which will shift population within Israel proper to the east, closer to the settlement blocs, so that they can become fully integrated parts of Israel proper.
The wall confiscates land that sits atop the major aquifers of the region. Already the settlers, who comprise less than 10% of the population of the West Bank, use 80% of the water resources. The wall will take what's left.
The wall is the end of any possible Palestinian state. The two-state solution was a reluctant compromise for many Palestinians, but was adopted and supported by their leadership and the vast majority of those who live in the Occupied Territories. It relinquished almost 80% of the historic land of Palestine to Israel, in return for the promise of an autonomous state on the other 20%.To most Israelis, it seemed a reasonable solution, and most Palestinians were willing to accept it, however reluctantly.
With the construction of the wall, that option is gone. The wall does not leave enough territory, water or resources to constitute a state. It creates isolated, open-air prisons out of the Palestinian population centers.
Whether you personally favor a two-state, one-state or no-state solution, unilaterally removing one of the major options for the region is no way to bring about either peace or security. And if Sharon's policies remove the option of a separate state for Palestinians, we must ask what end-game is he planning? Perpetual occupation, eternal effectual imprisonment for four million people? Transfer? Outright genocide? These options, elsewhere, are called 'ethnic cleansing,' and none of them are likely to bring about increased security or peace for Israel or the rest of the world.
A real policy of security would begin with a moratorium, on Israel's part, on the building of the wall, on policies of 'targeted assassinations', on attacks on civilians and brutal responses to nonviolent demonstrations. Such acts would be a small beginning of a change in course that would demonstrate good faith and a genuine desire for negotiations in which all people of the region could have a voice in determining their future.
It is up to those of us in the US, which funds the Occupation, and the international community to raise our voices now, to put pressure on Sharon to stop murdering civilians and children in the name of security, and begin pursuing a true path toward peace.
*********************************************
For a map of the wall, see:
http://www.gush-shalom.org/thewall/index.html
For information about the International Solidarity Movement, see
http://www.palsolidarity.org .
Starhawk has made four trips to the Occupied Terriitories in the last two years with the International Solidarity Movement. For an archive of her posts and writings about Palestine, see http://www.starhawk.org. She is an activist, organizer, and author of nine published books, including her latest, "Webs of Power: Notes from the Global Uprising" and eight other books on feminism, politics and earth-based spirituality. She teaches Earth Activist Trainings that combine permaculture design and activist skills, and works with the RANT trainer's collective, http://www.rantcollective.org that offers training and support for mobilizations around global justice and peace issues.
To get Starhawk's periodic posts of her writings, email Starhawk-subscribe@lists.riseup.net and put 'subscribe' in the subject heading.
A lovely full day
It's now after midnight on Sunday morning and I've just returned home from dinner and the 9:30 PM movie at the Detroit Institute of Arts with my friend Pat Kolon and her sister BJ.
My Saturday began with numerous phone calls to Pat to work out our plans for next week's trip to New York City. I may have mentioned that my niece Gretchen and her Significant Other, Matt, are getting married in Central Park on Saturday, May 29. Pat and I are driving my new minivan--now named Sojourner--to NYC, leaving Detroit on Wednesday morning, May 26, and returning home Monday afternoon, May 31. Saturday will be my family day, but the other days and nights, Pat and I are planning to "do the town." For us, that means jazz and more jazz. So this morning I made reservations and/or bought tickets online for us to see Taj Mahal at the Blue Note on Thursday night, Marian McPartland at Birdland on Friday night, and Kiyoshi Kitagawa at the Blue Note for brunch on Sunday. I find it amazing that these legends of jazz and blues are performing at two of the three most respected jazz clubs (the Village Vanguard being the third) on the very weekend we'll be in New York. I am VERY excited!
After completing that business, I drove to pick up my alterations at Nini's, came home, and then scooted down to the gym. I worked out, visited briefly with Ed at his office, and scooted home. For some reason I was exhausted, so lay down for what ended up being a two-hour nap. After I'd showered and dressed, I received a phone call from my friend Jeff in California. He asked me to be part of a conference--I on the speaker phone and the others sitting in his living room--to discuss whether kindergarten would be a good idea for his son Noah next year, and if not, what would be a good alternative. As they say, it takes a village to raise a child. All too soon it was time for me to go pick up Pat and BJ for our night out.
And now it is time for me to hit the sack after this lovely full day.
My Saturday began with numerous phone calls to Pat to work out our plans for next week's trip to New York City. I may have mentioned that my niece Gretchen and her Significant Other, Matt, are getting married in Central Park on Saturday, May 29. Pat and I are driving my new minivan--now named Sojourner--to NYC, leaving Detroit on Wednesday morning, May 26, and returning home Monday afternoon, May 31. Saturday will be my family day, but the other days and nights, Pat and I are planning to "do the town." For us, that means jazz and more jazz. So this morning I made reservations and/or bought tickets online for us to see Taj Mahal at the Blue Note on Thursday night, Marian McPartland at Birdland on Friday night, and Kiyoshi Kitagawa at the Blue Note for brunch on Sunday. I find it amazing that these legends of jazz and blues are performing at two of the three most respected jazz clubs (the Village Vanguard being the third) on the very weekend we'll be in New York. I am VERY excited!
After completing that business, I drove to pick up my alterations at Nini's, came home, and then scooted down to the gym. I worked out, visited briefly with Ed at his office, and scooted home. For some reason I was exhausted, so lay down for what ended up being a two-hour nap. After I'd showered and dressed, I received a phone call from my friend Jeff in California. He asked me to be part of a conference--I on the speaker phone and the others sitting in his living room--to discuss whether kindergarten would be a good idea for his son Noah next year, and if not, what would be a good alternative. As they say, it takes a village to raise a child. All too soon it was time for me to go pick up Pat and BJ for our night out.
And now it is time for me to hit the sack after this lovely full day.
Friday, May 21, 2004
Survivors describe wedding massacre as generals refuse to apologize
Will the slaughter and lies never end? We have become monsters from hell.
Published on Friday, May 21, 2004 by the Guardian/UK
"US Soldiers Started to Shoot Us, One by One"
Survivors describe wedding massacre as generals refuse to apologize
by Rory McCarthy in Ramadi
Published on Friday, May 21, 2004 by the Guardian/UK
"US Soldiers Started to Shoot Us, One by One"
Survivors describe wedding massacre as generals refuse to apologize
by Rory McCarthy in Ramadi
Detroiter named governor of Najaf in Iraq
This week I received a copy of the following email from a friend:
Remember that anti-war protest that we both attended outside the Ritz Carleton Hotel in Dearborn? And I went across the street to ask those Arabic pro-war protesters "why???"
The man I spoke with who seemed to be "running the show" gave me his business card - Adnan Alzurufi, "Iraqi Uprising Committee" and told me that he was supporting Bush because they needed to get rid of Hussein and that he (man I was talking to) had been imprisoned and tortured by Hussein.
Later, During the invasion of Iraq I saw this very man on television dressed in US Army clothing - I absolutely know it was him. NOW, in this past Monday's paper I see the Pentagon has appointed him "Governor" of the Iraq province of Najaf. - there is a pic of him along with the article. (I copied and pasted the article below)
This all seems rather weird to me and I am wondering if and how the Pentagon/Bushites could have convinced all of those protesting, pro-war Arabic people to support him.....
Seems to me I remember [another friend] saying at the time that [she] thought those pro-war, Arabic, people were "Bush plants" and I thought that was a preposterous idea.....
and - does the Free Press article explain the situation and I'm just not understanding?????????"
*************************
Detroiter named governor of Najaf in Iraq
Detroit Free Press, May 10, 2004
A Detroit man who once was jailed and tortured under Saddam Hussein's regime has become the governor of the Iraq province of Najaf.
Adnan Alzurufi, a native of Najaf, was appointed last week by the Pentagon at a time when the United States is struggling to take control of the strategically important region and city of the same name. The southern city of Najaf is considered holy by Shi'ite Muslims.
In Detroit, Alzurufi's wife and children said Friday they were glad to hear of his appointment.
"I feel very proud," said his son Montadar, 16, one of Alzurufi's seven children. "But I do worry about" his safety.
Alzurufi said that during the 1980s as a student in his homeland, he organized anti-Hussein groups in opposition to the Iran-Iraq war. The ruling Baath Party jailed him for five years in Najaf and Baghdad, where he said his captors whipped him and used electrical shocks on his leg and groin.
In 1991, he escaped and took part in an uprising against Hussein after the U.S. invasion of Iraq during the first Persian Gulf War.
Alzurufi fled Iraq for Detroit in 1994, part of a large number of Iraqi Shi'ite Muslims who came to Michigan after Hussein crushed the uprising. In 1997, Alzurufi formed the Iraqi Uprising Committee to mobilize local Iraqis. In April
2003, he was one of a dozen exiles flown by the Pentagon to Iraq as part of rebuilding efforts.
I was also at the demonstration in front of the Ritz Carleton Hotel where the writer of this email met Adnan Alzurufi. It was held at the Fairlane Mall in Dearborn on October 14, 2002. George W. Bush was speaking at a $1000 Republican fundraising dinner at the Ritz Carleton Hotel. Local peace groups and individuals had gathered with signs and banners to let Bush know what we thought of his proposed war on Iraq. Of course, the Dearborn police made sure we didn't get anywhere near George W. Bush and his financial supporters, but we did what we always do--we sang and chanted anyway. We were a diverse group of young and old, Muslim and non-Muslim.
After a short while, a group of men started walking through the crowd, yelling that Saddam Hussein was evil and must be "taken out," even if it means war. They handed out flyers that identified themselves as Iraqis who had been tortured and forced to flee their country because of Saddam Hussein. They were so loud and confrontational that the police moved their group across the street after several arguments broke out between the pro-war and anti-war contingents. From then on, the two camps tried to out-yell and out-chant one another, with the Iraqi group definitely "winning" the war of the words.
What I remember noticing was that: 1) the Iraqi pro-war group had an unusually large number of professionally-made signs and banners; and 2) I'd never before seen so many members of the press and media--national as well as local--at any Detroit area anti-war or anti-Bush demonstration. This made me suspect that the Bush team had helped the pro-war Iraqi community mount their demonstration, and had contacted the press and media to let em know there would be a good story here. Clips from this demo appeared on national and international TV news that night, with interviews of the Iraqi pro-war demonstrators. It was obviously a PR paradise for the Bush administration to be able to show they had the support of American Iraqis for their proposed war.
So now--one and a half years later--we hear that Adnan Alzurufi, the leader of that Detroit area pro-war demonstration, has been named governor of Najaf, a real hotspot in the war-that-never-ends. Not only that, but this same individual was seen in a photo taken during the war in Iraq, wearing a U.S. military uniform. He's pretty tight with Bush and Rumsfeld, I'd say.
But why should I be surprised?
Remember that anti-war protest that we both attended outside the Ritz Carleton Hotel in Dearborn? And I went across the street to ask those Arabic pro-war protesters "why???"
The man I spoke with who seemed to be "running the show" gave me his business card - Adnan Alzurufi, "Iraqi Uprising Committee" and told me that he was supporting Bush because they needed to get rid of Hussein and that he (man I was talking to) had been imprisoned and tortured by Hussein.
Later, During the invasion of Iraq I saw this very man on television dressed in US Army clothing - I absolutely know it was him. NOW, in this past Monday's paper I see the Pentagon has appointed him "Governor" of the Iraq province of Najaf. - there is a pic of him along with the article. (I copied and pasted the article below)
This all seems rather weird to me and I am wondering if and how the Pentagon/Bushites could have convinced all of those protesting, pro-war Arabic people to support him.....
Seems to me I remember [another friend] saying at the time that [she] thought those pro-war, Arabic, people were "Bush plants" and I thought that was a preposterous idea.....
and - does the Free Press article explain the situation and I'm just not understanding?????????"
*************************
Detroiter named governor of Najaf in Iraq
Detroit Free Press, May 10, 2004
A Detroit man who once was jailed and tortured under Saddam Hussein's regime has become the governor of the Iraq province of Najaf.
Adnan Alzurufi, a native of Najaf, was appointed last week by the Pentagon at a time when the United States is struggling to take control of the strategically important region and city of the same name. The southern city of Najaf is considered holy by Shi'ite Muslims.
In Detroit, Alzurufi's wife and children said Friday they were glad to hear of his appointment.
"I feel very proud," said his son Montadar, 16, one of Alzurufi's seven children. "But I do worry about" his safety.
Alzurufi said that during the 1980s as a student in his homeland, he organized anti-Hussein groups in opposition to the Iran-Iraq war. The ruling Baath Party jailed him for five years in Najaf and Baghdad, where he said his captors whipped him and used electrical shocks on his leg and groin.
In 1991, he escaped and took part in an uprising against Hussein after the U.S. invasion of Iraq during the first Persian Gulf War.
Alzurufi fled Iraq for Detroit in 1994, part of a large number of Iraqi Shi'ite Muslims who came to Michigan after Hussein crushed the uprising. In 1997, Alzurufi formed the Iraqi Uprising Committee to mobilize local Iraqis. In April
2003, he was one of a dozen exiles flown by the Pentagon to Iraq as part of rebuilding efforts.
I was also at the demonstration in front of the Ritz Carleton Hotel where the writer of this email met Adnan Alzurufi. It was held at the Fairlane Mall in Dearborn on October 14, 2002. George W. Bush was speaking at a $1000 Republican fundraising dinner at the Ritz Carleton Hotel. Local peace groups and individuals had gathered with signs and banners to let Bush know what we thought of his proposed war on Iraq. Of course, the Dearborn police made sure we didn't get anywhere near George W. Bush and his financial supporters, but we did what we always do--we sang and chanted anyway. We were a diverse group of young and old, Muslim and non-Muslim.
After a short while, a group of men started walking through the crowd, yelling that Saddam Hussein was evil and must be "taken out," even if it means war. They handed out flyers that identified themselves as Iraqis who had been tortured and forced to flee their country because of Saddam Hussein. They were so loud and confrontational that the police moved their group across the street after several arguments broke out between the pro-war and anti-war contingents. From then on, the two camps tried to out-yell and out-chant one another, with the Iraqi group definitely "winning" the war of the words.
What I remember noticing was that: 1) the Iraqi pro-war group had an unusually large number of professionally-made signs and banners; and 2) I'd never before seen so many members of the press and media--national as well as local--at any Detroit area anti-war or anti-Bush demonstration. This made me suspect that the Bush team had helped the pro-war Iraqi community mount their demonstration, and had contacted the press and media to let em know there would be a good story here. Clips from this demo appeared on national and international TV news that night, with interviews of the Iraqi pro-war demonstrators. It was obviously a PR paradise for the Bush administration to be able to show they had the support of American Iraqis for their proposed war.
So now--one and a half years later--we hear that Adnan Alzurufi, the leader of that Detroit area pro-war demonstration, has been named governor of Najaf, a real hotspot in the war-that-never-ends. Not only that, but this same individual was seen in a photo taken during the war in Iraq, wearing a U.S. military uniform. He's pretty tight with Bush and Rumsfeld, I'd say.
But why should I be surprised?
Thursday, May 20, 2004
My Special Memories of 2003-2004
Ah, the children. Today was my next-to-last Thursday before school is over for the year and the fifth graders graduate. I tried to be conscious of and grateful for every single minute.
--M. asking me to sing "Circle Round For Freedom" with her since they're now learning it in chorus. Then her teaching me the English translation of an Arabic song that I love. Singing these two songs over and over with the fifth grade chorus members as we sat and worked on our weaving project. M. testing me at the end of class by making me sing it alone. Her smiling like a pleased teacher and saying, "Yes, you've got it now" when I'd finished.
--A line of kindergarten students coming up to my chair to show me their wonderful magic crayon "star" pictures on black paper. Their shy smiles turning into proud grins as I praised their work.
--A fourth grade girl stopping in to the art classroom especially to give me a specially-wrapped gift of candies. Even though I've only joined her art class once this year, we are dear friends from last year.
--Getting help tying the knots in my weaving project from the fifth grade boys and girls at my table. Their patience with my repeated requests for help.
--Receiving my usual hugs from second grade boys and girls as they came into the class. And again when they left. I wonder why some classes are so naturally affectionate?
--All the kids' excitement over my upcoming trip to my niece's wedding in New York over the Memorial Day weekend, even though it means I'll miss school next week. One of my favorite fifth grade girls begging me to take her with me. "I'll hide in your suitcase!"
--Having a class full of second graders draw Ms. Patricia as part of their "Special Memories 2003-2004" booklet. How hard they worked and the honesty of their results.
--A., one of our most challenging fifth graders, finishing the weaving project before anyone else, and doing a superb job. The teacher Susan's praise and A.'s obvious pride.
--The pictures I took today of every class, pictures I must artistically distort in order to post online, but that hopefully still show the life and energy of these amazing youngsters.
--Today's two-page (photos #1 & #2) Detroit Free Press "Yak Corner" pictures and article on our school's Clean Up Parade in the neighborhood last Tuesday. Even though I was sick and had to miss it, this well-deserved public celebration of our kids made me feel like I'd been there.
--M. asking me to sing "Circle Round For Freedom" with her since they're now learning it in chorus. Then her teaching me the English translation of an Arabic song that I love. Singing these two songs over and over with the fifth grade chorus members as we sat and worked on our weaving project. M. testing me at the end of class by making me sing it alone. Her smiling like a pleased teacher and saying, "Yes, you've got it now" when I'd finished.
--A line of kindergarten students coming up to my chair to show me their wonderful magic crayon "star" pictures on black paper. Their shy smiles turning into proud grins as I praised their work.
--A fourth grade girl stopping in to the art classroom especially to give me a specially-wrapped gift of candies. Even though I've only joined her art class once this year, we are dear friends from last year.
--Getting help tying the knots in my weaving project from the fifth grade boys and girls at my table. Their patience with my repeated requests for help.
--Receiving my usual hugs from second grade boys and girls as they came into the class. And again when they left. I wonder why some classes are so naturally affectionate?
--All the kids' excitement over my upcoming trip to my niece's wedding in New York over the Memorial Day weekend, even though it means I'll miss school next week. One of my favorite fifth grade girls begging me to take her with me. "I'll hide in your suitcase!"
--Having a class full of second graders draw Ms. Patricia as part of their "Special Memories 2003-2004" booklet. How hard they worked and the honesty of their results.
--A., one of our most challenging fifth graders, finishing the weaving project before anyone else, and doing a superb job. The teacher Susan's praise and A.'s obvious pride.
--The pictures I took today of every class, pictures I must artistically distort in order to post online, but that hopefully still show the life and energy of these amazing youngsters.
--Today's two-page (photos #1 & #2) Detroit Free Press "Yak Corner" pictures and article on our school's Clean Up Parade in the neighborhood last Tuesday. Even though I was sick and had to miss it, this well-deserved public celebration of our kids made me feel like I'd been there.